Skip navigation

“In a world full of violence, destruction and death, or “madness in every direction,” as Kerouac would have said, the subject becomes nothing but a projector of the evil within society.”
Cengiz Erdem

The Nihil Solipsist: a being that knows neither its own nothingness nor the dark self-cannibalizing force of all those others within; trapped within the introjected prison-house of an impure fear, bound to the cross of a symbolic gesture, tormented by the thought of its own paranoid-schizoid position this Nietzschean subject relishes the hunt as a repetition of the life-death drives it seeks to unleash at the hands of all those non-others within its own panopticon of deliriums. Cengiz Erdem in his essay The Nietzschean Subject tells us that the “paradoxical nature of the contemporary Nietzschean subject is a result of the turning of self into the other within in the process of becoming. The self of the present has not only become a prison-house of the others within itself but also it itself has become a self-contained monad with no relation to the outside and no awareness of the external world populated by the others’ selves.”

Erdem tells us that today everything has been reduced to the pure or impure exchange value of Capital; even the invention of subjectivity, which no longer touches the oldest of criteria: use value. Instead we have always already become a cog in the machine, a machinic subject, a zombified cogito serving the greater good of Capital itself. Like somnambulists in a dream matrix we have become the illusory beneficiaries of an inhuman thought:

“With societies based on exchange value the relationship between the subject and the object is confined in the paranoid-schizoid position. There remains no gap between the subject and the object when in fact there should be. Everything becomes a substitute for another thing and everything is substitutable. With the advance of global capitalism the subject itself becomes an object. The subject begins to act itself out as an object for the desire and consumption of the other. The subject becomes a substitute of itself.  With global capitalism the subject starts to feel itself as a machine; it becomes inorganic for itself when in fact it is essentially organic. In other words organs start to operate like non-organs, all organicity is replaced by inorganicity, life with death, and in this kind of a society everyone is always already dead.”

Consuming machines that we are we have been reduced to eating our own… shall I say it: shit! Instead of difference we have all become entrepreneurs of the self-same identity of Capital: trending our way to the avant-garde in our latest designer outfits we speak the local lingo like the good netizens we are, forging identities in a spurious masqueradism of conformity to the latest fashion boutique or philosophical blog, hip-hopping or rapping along to life’s happy nihilism like black metal fetishists apotropaically defending ourselves against the encrustations of an artificial slime world where the gods of filth and dionysian ecstasy infuse us with the abyss of the inhuman. Or, as Erdem defines it: “With the advance of global capitalism this herd-instinct can be said to have become nothing but a result of the exploitation of the life and death drives to reduce life to a struggle for and against life/death. The subject no longer has to carry the burden of being different. In this light and in this time we can see global capitalism creating not only the conditions of possibility for the subject to forget itself but also the conditions of impossibility for a remembrance of self, producing the non-knowledge of self as the counter-knowledge.”

Nietzsche‘s Ecce Homo has become for the new trend setters the glorious cookbook for ‘healthy living’, and all those pesky little ghosts of our forbears otherness has suddenly surprised us as the unmasking of our daily selves in the present. Erdem in a final colloquy relates that ”the the non-reason inherent in reason has become the reason itself, and yet the questions remain:

1. What can be learned from Nietzsche’s failure, which caused and continues to cause many other failures?

2. What are the conditions of possibility for a non-antagonistic and yet non-illusory relationship between the self and the other and how can they be sustained?

Those two questions could and should fill volumes, but being a small blog report upon the workings of such a fine mind we can only hope that Cengiz Erdem will be answering these either fully or partially in his upcoming book?

Addendum: Cengiz published another essay just after the previous one, Barbaric Regress and Civilised Progress contra Deconstruction and Affirmative Recreation, which offers some further reflection on the above topic.

via Dark Chemistry

3 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. […] Dark Chemistry aka S.C. Hickman on The Nietzschean Subject; or, the Prison-House of Delirium (senselogic.wordpress.com) […]

  2. […] Dark Chemistry aka S.C. Hickman on The Nietzschean Subject; or, the Prison-House of Delirium (senselogic.wordpress.com) Share this:Share on TumblrMoreDiggPrintEmail Pin ItLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. Tags: Alain Badiou, Amsterdam, Ölümsüzlük Teorisi, ölüm, ölümsüzlük, Badiou, beyaz ekran, Bluetooth, cengiz erdem, Deleuze, descartes, edebiyat, felsefe, felsefe ve edebiyat, Gilles Deleuze, hiçlik, iletişim, kapitalizm, Linux, London, Maps and Views, medya, michel foucault, Middle East, Minimal, Netherlands, nihilizm, North Holland, panopticon, Red Light District, roman, Saramago, söyleşi, sinema, spekülatif gerçekçilik, Spinoza, televizyon, Turkey, yaratıcılık, yaşam, yıkıcılık […]

  3. […] Dark Chemistry aka S.C. Hickman on The Nietzschean Subject; or, the Prison-House of Delirium Share this:Share on TumblrMoreDiggPrintEmail Pin ItLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. Tags: affirmative recreation, Alain Badiou, Badiou, capitalism, Cengiz Erdem, death, death drive, Deleuze, Diet-Coke, Ernst Kris, Friedrich Nietzsche, Gilles Deleuze, immanence, immortality, Jacques Lacan, Kant, Lacan, michel foucault, Nietzsche, Object relations theory, objet petit a, philosophy, Politics, psychoanalysis, Quentin Meillassoux, Real, Sign (semiotics), Slavoj Žižek, Social Sciences, Speculative Realism, The Symbolic, Zizek […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: